Friday, 3 July 2009

Tacitus - What did he say?

The third non-biblical source about Jesus I want to look at is from a guy named Cornelius Tacitus (56-117 AD). Tacitus was a Roman historian who produced at least 5 works. His Histories and Annuals are considered his two greatest. From them we learn a lot about what happened in the first century. Historians do not have a complete set of these works, but they have enough to regard him as an accurate historian. The encyclopedia Britannica starts off with describing Tacitus as "probably the greatest historian and one of the greatest prose stylists who wrote in the Latin language."

All writings (including my own) of cause has some bias to it. See if you can spot any bias in this quote from Tacitus in his Annuals 15.44:

Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judæa, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their entre and become popular.


Given the fact that he calls this Christianity a source of abomination and evil, it is very unlikely that it was doctored by a Christian scribe at a latter date.

Pontius Pilate Position: Procurator or Prefect?

There is a small debate in this text about what Tacitus says about Pilate's position, but even the atheist historian Richard Carrier (who is the only historian I know of who says: "[it is] very probable Jesus never actually existed") doesn't even have a problem with this so called error:

It seems evident from all the source material available that the post was always a prefecture, and also a procuratorship. Pilate was almost certainly holding both posts simultaneously, a practice that was likely established from the start when Judaea was annexed in 6 A.D. And since it is more insulting (to an elitist like Tacitus and his readers) to be a procurator, and even more insulting to be executed by one, it is likely Tacitus chose that office out of his well-known sense of malicious wit. Tacitus was also a routine employer of variatio, deliberately seeking nonstandard ways of saying things (it is one of several markers of Tacitean style). So there is nothing unusual about his choice here. - From point 10. i. on this page

(Possibly) Related Posts:

  • Mara Bar-Serapion - Is it Jesus?In the last post we saw a few possibilities of who this "wise king" in the letter from Mar Bar-Serapion could be. The ones that we looked at seem to be in high positions of teaching, they were Jews and were possibly killed by… Read More
  • Thallus - What can we say?This post continues on from this one.A shade of a shadeThis Thallus reference shows us just how hard it is sometimes for historians to piece together what happened back in the day. Only about 10% of the population around the … Read More
  • Tacitus - What did he say?The third non-biblical source about Jesus I want to look at is from a guy named Cornelius Tacitus (56-117 AD). Tacitus was a Roman historian who produced at least 5 works. His Histories and Annuals are considered his two grea… Read More
  • Jesus - Not even in the BibleNow I read digg articles and their comments just knowing there would be someone on there that disagrees with me (is it just me or do you do that as well?). Some things just cause me to cringe and sometimes I feel pain. Now al… Read More
  • Mara Bar-Serapion - The textThe second bit of non-Christian evidence outside of Jesus is a little extract from a letter from a stoic father in prison to his son. This extract to some may seem a little slim (like the Thallus reference) due to the lack of… Read More

0 comments:

Post a Comment